An Annotated Wimsey
Introduction
The
LordPeter mailing list has
undertaken the project of reading and discussing all the Lord Peter
Wimsey stories in something like chronological order. As I started
rereading Whose Body?, I was reminded of how many times I've
wished there were an Annotated Wimsey. But alas, Sayers had not yet
found her Martin Gardner. So I thought, anyway. Lacking the time or
the knowledge to make up for the lack, I'm still using the occasion to
compile as many notes as possible on the maze of allusions in the
stories, particularly the variously obscure matters of literature,
music, and 20s history.
In fact, there is an Annotated Wimsey:
Stephan Clarke's The Lord Peter Wimsey
Companion (ISBN 0892968508, Mysterious Press, 1985). Of course,
it's out of print, and copies very rarely turn up. If you've
got one, cherish it. The good
news is that work on a new revised edition is now far advanced; we may see
it in print (and on CD-ROM) by the end of 2002.
When the new Companion comes out, it is going to be the definitive
work. In the meantime, these pages offer a different view, less
exacting and perhaps more whimsical. Not being a printed reference
work, they are in order of page number within the books. which can be
convenient for the reader. (The costs of reprinting preclude putting out
the Companion either in the format of The Annotated Alice or
hyperlinked to the text.)
Other Wimseyan Sources
A central collection of Wimsey links is in Jennifer Talley's
Wimsey page.
Notes on the Notes
What needs annotation, and what doesn't?
You can explain everything, giving the impression that your readers are
pig-ignorant. Or you can leave things out, implying "Nobody
is so ignorant as not to know that!" Or, perhaps worst of
all, you can write notes that apologize for themselves, which is
somehow even more patronizing.
Dropping that last practice is a no-brainer. The best practice, which
I'll attempt to emulate, is probably that of Harold Ross, who founded
The New Yorker: Explain everything. As I recall, he said that
the only two people you could name without any explanation were
Houdini and Sherlock Holmes. So,
if you find a note somewhere that makes you gnash your teeth at its
explanation of the obvious, please consider that I may have done the
same. Though more probably I gnashed my teeth at the obviousness of
some other note.
For all that, here is a list of things that are taken for granted in my
text.
- Alice
- The reader is assumed to have heard of the major
works of Lewis Carroll, which are the second most widely reprinted
books in English, and the most widely reprinted of original English
works.
- Bible
- Biblical citations will be given without explanation,
as in
Luke 16:1-9. In some cases I may link to an on-line copy of the text, as with one of Sayers's favorite parables. Naturally, references will normally be to the Authorized (King James) Version, which Wimsey would have used.
- Lord Peter Wimsey
- In the least indefensible of these
practices, the Peter Wimsey stories will simply be cited by name, or
sometimes by standard abbreviation (see below).
- LPWC
- The Lord Peter Wimsey Companion, cited above.
- OED
- The Oxford English Dictionary, originally and properly
known as the New English Dictionary, but no one would recognize
that.
- Sherlock Holmes
- The Holmes stories will simply be
referenced by name, as if no one in the world could fail to recognize
The Hound of the Baskervilles or The Lion's
Mane.
The notes as published here are based on my postings to the LordPeter
mail list, with many changes and additions from the people on the list.
I have tried to give credit where credit is due; please let me know
where I've slipped up.
Page numbers in the text are mainly from my 1970-ish Avon paperbacks. I've
given the page number for the start of each chapter, so that you can
relate the numbers I use to those in your favorite edition. This
should make finding text much easier till the arrival of that
Definitive Edition whose very page numbers I am unworthy to compute.
How long, how long, O Lord?
References to the various stories will commonly use the
abbreviations
that the mailing list uses; these are defined when they first appear.
Finally, is it necessary to say that I welcome
any comments and corrections and additions?
The Books Annotated
These notes contain many questions that the collected learning of the Lord Peter list has not been able to answer. More than likely, there are also things in the books that ought to have been annotated but have not been. It's even possible that there are errors in the notes.
If you have any corrections or additions, please send them to
Cousin Matthew, the Wimsey family's archivist. I'll assume, absent anything to the contrary, that such material is fair game for addition to this Web site, with due attribution.
Private mail, and material definitely not intended for publication here, can be sent to my personal e-mail address, which is given below. In any case, of course, you can request whatever treatment you want for your material.
First, relative to matter from the Lord Peter list, we've reached a consensus that what's posted in that public forum is potential material for this collection, barring a request to the contrary. As new people show up and contribute, I'll try to assure that they either join in the consensus or opt out of it.
For matter that's posted there or sent to
Cousin Matthew,
here are the general rules on attribution.
- I'll quote or paraphrase passages of reasonable length, with due credit.
- If it gets to quoting a whole essay, I'll ask first.
- Due credit means, usually, attaching the person's name as it appears in postings:
- If your signature line includes a
nom for the LordPeter list, that will be the credit.
- Otherwise, if the sig contains a real name or something that looks like one,
that will be the credit.
- Otherwise, if there's a name or an apparent name in your e-mail return address, that will be the credit.
- Otherwise, credit goes the illustrious master Anon.
- By default, I won't attach people's e-mail addresses.
- Anybody who wants different treatment, please let me know.
- I'd like also to post a list of name, nom, e-mail, and home-page address
for people quoted, but only with explicit permission from each person
listed. And I don't know whether it will happen.
- A real scholar would give each item a proper footnote, including the
unique Internet Message-Id field of the posting, but in general I'll
skip that.
Do let me know if you want a different treatment for what is, after
all, your intellectual property.
Date last modified: April 2, 2002.
Built April 2, 2002
Dan Drake's Home Page
Mail to dd@dandrake.com
Copyright (C) 1999 Daniel Drake. A royalty-free license to
reproduce this document in whole or in part is hereby granted provided
(i) all additions, omissions, and other changes are clearly marked;
(ii) the work is not reproduced as, or as part of, a work for which
payment is charged; (iii) this notice is reproduced without change.
Quotations for critical or polemical purposes, with proper attribution,
are permitted in any case, being obviously fair use.
Document:
http://www.dandrake.com/wimsey/index.html